Rapid reviews: finding the sweet spot

The need for timely evidence is one of the realities that need consideration in evidence-informed decisionmaking. Decisionmakers often need evidence yesterday.  However, conducting a rigorous systematic review can take, depending on the question and the available trials, 1 to 3 years.  This has created a need for rapid reviews.  Generally rapid reviews are regarded as an accelerated response (from 24 hours to 16 weeks), but there is currently no universal accepted definition or methodology. The concepts and challenges related to rapid reviews were explored today at a session at the Cochrane Colloquium.  Key themes were:

  • Rapid reviews may not be feasible in all circumstances
  • A one size fits all approach is not necessarily realistic
  • At which stage(s) should the process be accelerated?

In the presentations, rapid reviews varied from being:

  • Compiling a rapid review documenting existing evidence from systematic reviews
  • A rapid update of an existing outdated systematic review
  • Conducting a systematic review using accelerated methods (short cuts)

Through the Cochrane Innovations Company, a procedure manual for the preparation of Cochrane Response Rapid Reviews is currently being drafted.  This manual consists of 11 stages for conducting such a Cochrane Response.

Let’s watch the space for future developments.


About Centre for Evidence-based Health Care

Evidence-based health care is the use of best evidence to inform healthcare decision-making to improve patient care. The Centre for Evidence-based Health Care develops, teaches and promotes evidence-based health care (EBHC) at undergraduate and postgraduate levels of all healthcare professionals; provides EBHC support and resources to healthcare professionals to help maintain the highest standards of healthcare practice; and enhances the use of best evidence by government, non-governmental organizations and the private sector in healthcare policy and practices. The Centre works in collaboration with a number of local and international institutions. The key principles are to encourage dialogue, enhance EBHC activities and to avoid duplication.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s